The established competitors worth comparing against Airtable โ researched and reviewed by our editorial team.
Baserow
Open sourceSelf-hostBest for: Teams who want an open-source Airtable they can self-host
Visit โBaserow is the most direct open-source Airtable clone โ fields, views, formulas, automations, all in a familiar interface. Self-host on your own infra or use their managed cloud. Active development and a real community.
Free self-hosted, $5/user/mo Premium Cloud, $20/user/mo Enterprise
Pros
- โOpen source (MIT) with active development
- โSelf-host yourself or use their cloud
- โFeature parity with Airtable's core close enough for most teams
Cons
- รSmaller ecosystem than Airtable
- รSelf-hosting is real infra work
- รSome advanced Airtable features (Interfaces, Sync) not yet matched
NocoDB
Open sourceSelf-hostBest for: Engineers who want to turn an existing database into an Airtable-style UI
Visit โNocoDB sits on top of an existing SQL database (MySQL, Postgres, SQLite, MSSQL) and gives it an Airtable-style UI. Different premise than Baserow โ your data stays in a real database, NocoDB is the front end.
Free open source, $10/user/mo Cloud Business
Pros
- โOpen source (AGPL)
- โWorks on top of your existing database
- โFree self-hosted with no row limits
Cons
- รRequires database know-how to set up
- รUI less polished than Airtable or Baserow
- รCloud product newer and less mature
Notion
Best for: Teams who want database + docs + wiki in one tool
Visit โNotion's databases aren't as powerful as Airtable's, but they live alongside docs, wikis, and pages. For teams whose Airtable use case is "a few tables next to our docs", Notion consolidates the stack at the cost of database depth.
Free Personal, $10/user/mo Plus, $15/user/mo Business
Pros
- โDatabase + docs in one tool reduces tool sprawl
- โStrong free tier and mobile apps
- โMassive template community
Cons
- รDatabase performance softens past ~5k rows
- รNo formulas as powerful as Airtable's
- รCross-database relations weaker
Coda
Best for: Teams who want Airtable's database power with stronger doc and app-building
Visit โCoda has the most Airtable-like relational data model among the doc-shaped tools, plus buttons, automations, and Packs that turn docs into real applications. Pricing model only charges per Doc Maker โ viewers are free, which can dramatically reduce per-seat cost.
Free, $12/user/mo Pro, $36/user/mo Team
Pros
- โDatabase + formula model genuinely powerful
- โOnly charges per Doc Maker, viewers free
- โPacks ecosystem for integrations
Cons
- รSteeper learning curve than Notion
- รMobile less polished
- รSmaller template marketplace
Glide
Best for: Teams who want to turn an Airtable / Google Sheet into a real mobile app
Visit โGlide takes a spreadsheet and turns it into a polished mobile or web app โ no code, in an afternoon. The natural pairing with Airtable used to be Glide; in 2026 Glide has a built-in data layer too. Best fit when "make this data usable as an app" is the actual goal.
Free, $25/mo Starter, $99/mo Business, custom Enterprise
Pros
- โFastest spreadsheet-to-app workflow in the no-code space
- โPolished mobile output
- โBuilt-in data layer means you can skip Airtable entirely
Cons
- รPricing per-app and per-user adds up at scale
- รLess flexible than a custom-coded app
- รBest for SMB / internal tools, not consumer-scale apps